Now that there are many nations who will be building new economic and political structures, we
would like to offer some pragmatic and idealistic insights. Embrace feels that the world economy
offers many new opportunities and that much that is breaking down in the world economic scene is
corrupt and outdated.
We do not advocate any type of political system, except one that treats every individual equally by
law, is not corrupt and one that represents the best interests of all the population within a nation
regardless of religion, sect, philosophy, caste, gender, class, race, tribe or clan. The world
economy, however, must change radically.
The world economy as it has existed for centuries has greatly exploited a majority of non-western
nations which hold the greatest natural resources and labor markets. It has been extremely unjust in
the support of brutal, corrupt leadership in many non-western countries and this injustice; we believe
is at a pivotal point for rectification. We hope that many in the Western, Eastern, Central and
Southern parts of Africa will also soon move forward towards a more equitable change. South
America is on the verge of a renaissance, as are many countries in Asia.
There has been much discussion with regard to government and successful economics. In reality,
politics are not reflective of economic formats, procedure or success. For instance those in the
United States that are strongly allied with the current Wall Street system, often insinuate that
unfettered capitalism (Milton Friedman style) is a necessary component of democracy. This of
course, is not true. For many decades, the Scandinavian countries have had a democratic
“socialism.” (They vote for their political leaders, but their government pays for the greater needs of
it’s’ citizens, including health care, geriatric care and college tuition. - They have around 50% taxes.)
Most indigenous societies are democratic and they share communally many of their goods as well.
The Republic of China has robust capitalism without democracy. Human rights are not dependent
on democracy but are necessary for a secure economy. Economies do not thrive in war.
Despite the fact that Wall Street bankers would have the public believe that there is a difference
between “home grown” pyramid schemes and their own business, the Stock Market itself has
become a pyramid scheme due to insider trading as well as, the transition from analyzing, investing
and holding stocks to churning and trading stocks via algorithms in milliseconds. Even the most
staid companies now are pressured to constantly show growth. However, there always has to be a
limit to growth. Stable sales and holding portfolios especially looking out for dividend returns need to
be the renewed objectives if investors are not going to inflate the world economy out of existence.
As it is, many people in recent years have invested in non-realities, total fictions with no substance.
It is much like the story of the Emperors New Clothes. In the late 1980’s and more drastically in the
‘90‘s, (coincidentally following the break up of the Soviet Union) there was a massive layoff of many,
many employees in America. The layoffs started with executives in the six-figure range and worked
rapidly down to layoffs of many managers in the middle and lower range. With these layoffs came a
boom of independent investors and amateur traders, flush with their cashed-out 401-k’s.
(Employer/employee retirement schemes)
Miraculously inflated lines of credit attached to credit cards kept laid off employees across the USA
afloat for a considerable amount of time since those laid off could rarely find jobs, or if they did, the
jobs were usually substantially below the income they had been making prior to their redundancy.
These managers had four choices; they could (if they had enough money or lines of credit) buy a
franchise, or they could open a consulting business or become entrepreneurs (once again if they
had enough money or lines of credit with their credit cards). The last option was day trading . . .
trading stocks from home in an attempt to increase their investments enough, that they could live on
The two primary problems of day trading was that; 1.) While the “day traders” might have
understood the concept of “buy low, sell high”, they really could not compete with the programmed
trading systems of the large and midsize investment firms and 2.) There was such a demand for
investment products due to the vast numbers of people suddenly wanting to be involved in the stock
market that many laws that protected investment consumers (such as the Glass-Steagall Act) in the
midst of the frenzy were struck-down. The eradication of consumer protection laws was lobbied for
by both the commercial and investment banks. This enabled two things: a blurring of the divisions
between commercial banks (where individual consumers keep checking/ draft accounts) and
investment/ merchant banks serving the business community who are legislated to take “risks.” The
result was that consumer banks holding consumer mortgages, checking/ draft accounts and
federally insured savings/ deposit accounts were now legislated to take risks with Wall Street
One note needs to be made. At the time banks began lobbying to end the Glass-Steagall Act (in the
USA) few people were keeping savings accounts in commercial banks. The commercial banks could
not offer the interest rates that were possible in the stock market or even the interest rates that the
mainstream bond market could offer. Prior to all this, the growth potential for commercial banks was
secure but fairly stagnant until they started heavy risk marketing in credit card debt and
subsequently enjoined this risk with the additional risk of Wall Street financial instruments.
Start-up companies that should have been reserved as only venture capital preserves were being
offered on NASDAQ as legitimate businesses to the inexperienced public when in fact they were
little more than “ideas”. These companies often had almost no assets or equity and often the
“product” or “service” was only in the prototype stage.
These were the early signs of an economic breakdown. The out of control banks with phony
derivative packages, junk bonds, insurance hedges etc… have been documented ad infinitum. Few
of the executives or managers who lost their jobs beginning in the late ‘80s through to the end of the
‘90s ever regained the same corporate foothold they had before being made redundant. Many
families took a major downward shift in lifestyle from this time forward.
Free market banks are a problem sooner or later. For strengthening a local economy and your own
community the strongest, most enduring and generally the most ethical mode of depositing capital is
with a member/owner, non-profit credit union. Credit Unions have open meetings and must answer
the questions of any of it’s’ owner/ members. These banks also need to be backed up by depositor
The New Investment Market
With a worldwide depression created by Wall Street (which is now in decline in “real” trades versus
geographically diversified millisecond micro traders) to once again serve the interests of the global
economy must change substantially.
We expect that the new stock market will very likely develop into a direct seller to buyer market,
via the internet, without the investment/ merchant banks underwriting or making new share offerings.
Major corporations around the world are easily capable of making this change. Venture Capital firms
in the future will most likely have to assist new clients in bringing out their Initial Public Offerings.
Whatever needs to be done with regard to issuing corporate bonds, overseeing proxy issues,
issuing new convertible stocks, money market instruments or preferred stocks, etc., can be done by
the “in-house” MBA’s at major corporations. In fact, Wall Street is already outdated. We suspect it is
only a matter of time before pension funds and mutual funds will find it easier, more cost effective
and definitely more confidential to deal directly with corporate trading rooms than with investment
bank intermediaries, given the opportunity.
There is nothing at present to stop the “New Market” except the momentum of people doing what
they have always done. However, the truth is that all major corporations, especially the largest multi-
nationals are capable of holding positions and selling directly to pension funds, mutual funds and
individuals who wish to buy stocks from their in-house traders without going through investment
bank intermediaries. Let’s face it; most of the questionable business that goes on in the investment
market comes from the intermediaries. Insider trading requires an intermediary. Issuing bogus stocks
requires an intermediary. Using retail accounts to cover institutional losses, (think Bear Stearns)
requires a middleman.
It is easier for the SEC and other international regulatory bodies to regulate individual corporations
and keep track of their relatively straight forward trades than it is to regulate highly suspect
investment banks holding hundreds of investment instruments, some with retail accounts insinuating
perhaps tens of thousands of clients and positions in hundreds of companies. Mutual funds, of
course, hold a wide variety of funds on behalf of investors, but again, they are much easier to
investigate and regulate.
Governments, federal and regional can offer securities directly to consumers without investment
institutions. They are capable of operating their own trading of bonds, bills and notes.
Many Job Opportunities In The New System
Hundreds of thousands of people in the USA and Europe have lost their jobs on every level in the
banking and investment community. A direct buyer to seller market would create more jobs in the
financial sector than there are unemployed bankers and traders to fill them. Every public company,
as well as every county/ province, state and federal government wishing to offer debt instruments
would require in-house traders, computer trading programs, etc, etc… The change would also
require a considerable amount of advertising to inform the public of what is on offer. New financial
newsletters for analysis would be developed to assist both pension fund managers, mutual fund
managers and individuals to existing opportunities and pitfalls. People would need to go to school to
learn trading, economics and finance to secure careers working for corporate trading departments
and for government in-house trading. Classes would be required to update current financial
managers serving individuals. Stockbrokers would require completely new training, as they would be
compelled to work without institutional backing.
Regional International Trade
Small, mid-size to large manufacturers primarily private, as well as, independent consultants,
artisans, crafts people and farmers may if they choose, begin organizing cooperatives that enable
them to dialogue directly with regional communities across the world that need or desire their
It is possible that small and midsize companies will raise capital independently, such as Ben Cohen
and Jerry Greenfield did for the initial public offering of Ben & Jerry‘s Ice Cream (in the USA.) These
entrepreneurs sold their company stock at community meetings directly to the public.
Over the years whenever there has been a deadlock between labor and management of airlines in
the USA a profit sharing scheme is introduced. It works for a while and eventually it returns to
business as usual. Profit sharing means all employees hold an interest (stocks) in the company as
partial owners in lieu of additional pay.
In the past, profit sharing has not endured because there was no incentive to keep it working.
However, profit sharing can be highly successful and offers an opportunity to start up new ventures
and keep current ones solvent.
We believe the coming “New Markets” will be direct and very transparent. We believe that regional
co-operatives worldwide will operate efficiently and successfully. We believe profit sharing will be a
means to launch new small businesses and keep current ones solvent and profitable. We believe
the “New Direct Market” offers many, many new job opportunities within corporations and within
auxiliary services. Finally, we believe all the above will offer a more ethical and profitable means of
doing business around the world.
UPDATE Failed U.S. Banks 2007 - 2014
Please Note: Since 2007 the total number of banks that have failed in the USA is now 509 -