Researchers crack 50-year-old nuclear waste problem, make storage safer
Date:March 16, 2016
Source:University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill have adapted a technology developed for solar energy in
order to selectively remove one of the trickiest and most-difficult-to-remove elements in nuclear waste pools across the
country, making the storage of nuclear waste safer and nontoxic -- and solving a decades-old problem.
The work, published in Science, not only opens the door to expand the use of one of the most efficient energy sources on
the planet, but also adds a key step in completing the nuclear fuel cycle -- an advance, along with wind and solar, that could
help power the world's energy needs cleanly for the future.
Americium doesn't have the same name recognition as a plutonium and uranium, but researchers have been trying to
remove it from nuclear waste for decades. Several groups initially succeeded, only to be met with several subsequent
problems down the line, rendering the solution unfeasible. Meyer and his team, including Chris Dares, who spearheaded
the project, have found a way to remove the radioactive element without encountering downstream problems that have
The technology Meyer and Dares developed is closely related to the one used by Meyer at the UNC Energy Frontier
Research Center of Solar Fuels to tear electrons from water molecules. In the americium project, Meyer and Dares
adapted the technology to tear electrons from americium, which requires twice as much energy input as splitting water. By
removing those three electrons, americium behaves like plutonium and uranium, which is then easy to remove with existing
Dares describes that nuclear fuel is initially used as small solid pellets loaded into long, thin rods. To reprocess them, the
used fuel is first dissolved in acid and the plutonium and uranium separated. In the process, americium will either be
separated with plutonium and uranium or removed in a second step.
Meyer and Dares worked closely with Idaho National Laboratory (INL), who provided research support and technical
guidance on working with nuclear materials. Most of the experiments were carried out in the laboratories at Idaho, which
provided a safe area to work with radioactive material. At present, INL and UNC-Chapel Hill are in discussion about
extending the research and to possible scale up of the technology.
"With INL working with us, we have a strong foundation for scaling up this technology," said Dares. "With a scaled up
solution, not only will we no longer have to think about the dangers of storing radioactive waste long-term, but we will have a
viable solution to close the nuclear fuel cycle and contribute to solving the world's energy needs. That's exciting."
Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.
Bacteria could help clean groundwater contaminated by uranium ore processing
Date:June 15, 2015
A strain of bacteria that "breathes" uranium may hold the key to cleaning up polluted groundwater at sites where uranium
ore was processed to make nuclear weapons.
A team of Rutgers University scientists and collaborators discovered the bacteria in soil at an old uranium ore mill in Rifle,
Colorado, almost 200 miles west of Denver. The site is one of nine such mills in Colorado used during the heyday of
nuclear weapons production.
The research is part of a U.S. Department of Energy program to see if microorganisms can lock up uranium that leached
into the soil years ago and now makes well water in the area unsafe to drink.
The team's discovery, published in the April 13, 2015 issue of PLOS ONE, is the first known instance where scientists have
found a bacterium from a common class known as betaproteobacteria that breathes uranium. This bacterium can breathe
either oxygen or uranium to drive the chemical reactions that provide life-giving energy.
"After the newly discovered bacteria interact with uranium compounds in water, the uranium becomes immobile," said Lee
Kerkhof, a professor of marine and coastal sciences in the School of Environmental and Biological Sciences. "It is no
longer dissolved in the groundwater and therefore can't contaminate drinking water brought to the surface."
Kerkhof leads the Rutgers team that works with U.S. Department of Energy researchers.
Breathing uranium is rather rare in the microbial world. Most examples of bacteria which can respire uranium cannot
breathe oxygen but often breathe compounds based on metals -- typically forms of solid iron. Scientists had previously
witnessed decreasing concentrations of uranium in groundwater when iron-breathing bacteria were active, but they have
yet to show that those iron-breathing bacteria were directly respiring the uranium.
While the chemical reaction that the bacteria perform on uranium is a common process known as "reduction," or the act of
accepting electrons, Kerkhof said it's still a mystery how the reduced uranium produced by this microorganism ultimately
behaves in the subsurface environment.
"It appears that they form uranium nanoparticles," he said, but the mineralogy is still not well known and will be the subject
of ongoing research.
The Rutgers team was able to isolate the uranium-breathing bacterium in the lab by recognizing that uranium in samples
from the Rifle site could be toxic to microorganisms as well as humans. The researchers looked for signs of bacterial
activity when they gradually added small amounts of dissolved uranium at the right concentration back to the samples
where uranium had become immobilized. Once they found the optimal uranium concentrations, they were able to isolate
the novel strain.
Exactly how the strain evolved, Kerkhof said, "we are not sure." But, he explained, bacteria have the ability to pass genes to
each other. So just like bacteria pick up resistance to things like antibiotics and heavy metal toxicity, this bacterium "picked
up a genetic element that's now allowing it to detoxify uranium, to actually grow on uranium." His research team has
completed sequencing its genome to support future research into the genetic elements that allow the bacterium to grow on
What Kerkhof is optimistic about is the potential for these bacteria to mitigate the specific groundwater pollution problem in
Rifle. Scientists at first expected the groundwater to flush into the Colorado River and carry the dissolved uranium with it,
where it would get diluted to safer levels. But that hasn't happened. Other potential methods of remediation, such as digging
up the contaminated soil or treating it with harsh chemicals, are thought to be too expensive or hazardous.
"Biology is a way to solve this contamination problem, especially in situations like this where the radionuclides are highly
diluted but still present at levels deemed hazardous," said Kerkhof. If the approach is successful, it could be considered for
other sites where uranium was processed for nuclear arsenals or power plant fuel. While the problem isn't widespread, he
said there's potentially a lot of water to be concerned about. And the problem could spread beyond traditional places such
as ore processing sites.
"There is depleted uranium in a lot of armor-piercing munitions," he said, "so places like the Middle East that are
experiencing war could be exposed to high levels of uranium in the groundwater."
The above post is reprinted from materials provided by Rutgers University. The original item was written by Carl Blesch.
Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.
Nicole M. Koribanics, Steven J. Tuorto, Nora Lopez-Chiaffarelli, Lora R. McGuinness, Max M. Häggblom, Kenneth H.
Williams, Philip E. Long, Lee J. Kerkhof. Spatial Distribution of an Uranium-Respiring Betaproteobacterium at the Rifle, CO
Field Research Site. PLOS ONE, 2015; 10 (4): e0123378 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123378
Although the following commentaries are from SCIENCE magazine published by the American Association for the
Advancement of Science with regard to spent nuclear waste and do not address the deconstruction of the nuclear chain
reaction, this is an important consideration. The recent news that China is going to reuse their nuclear rods repeatedly,
moving them to new reactors for many years to come is a remarkable move forward for humanity and the environment.
IN THEIR POLICY FORUM “NUCLEAR WASTE: Knowledge waste?” (13 August, p 762), E.A. Rosa et al. overlook a
possible solution to nuclear waste: alternative fuel cycles, particularly the Thorium Fluoride, Molten-Salt Reactor (Thorium
The use of Thorium as a fertile reactor input has the potential to greatly reduce high-level reactor wastes (1). (Thorium-232
is bred by the reactor’s internal neutron flux to Uranium-233, which is then efficiently fissioned by another neutron. A small
proton accelerator can also do the breeding. U233 is unnatural, because of a short half-life, but fissions more easily than
the U235 used in typical reactors.) Adopting the MSR would further reduce waste by orders of magnitude (1,2) - there is not
solid fuel or refueling waste, and all fissiles entering the salts are consumed. …
TO READ THE REST OF THIS COMMENT: Science - AAAS
RESPONSE TO ALEXANDER CANNARA
CANNARA RECOMMENDS THE ADOPTION OF the Thorium Molten-Salt Reactor. We urge caution. The nuclear industry
has never fully realized safety and other promises, Grimes and Nuttall (1) explain that the fissile Uranium-233 produced by
the slow neutron capture of Thorium-232 “is difficult to extract and handle, because it is produced together with other highly
radioactive isotopes, and the performance of thorium fuels is not well understood. The proliferation resistance credentials of
the thorium fuel cycle deserve greater scrutiny but appear promising.” These are precisely the kinds of uncertainties and
risks that should be part of a wider public discourse about energy choices. …
Eugene A. Rose, Seth P. Tuler, Baruch Fischhoff, Thomas Webler, Sharon M. Friedman, Richard E. Sclove, Kristin
Shrader-Frechette, Mary R. English, Roger E. Kasperson, Robert L. Goble, Thomas M. Leschine, William Freudenburg,
Caron Chess, Charles Perrow, Kai Erickson, James F. Short
TO READ THE REST OF THIS RESPONSE: SCIENCE AAAS